... meaning this would be targeted to the male audience. Basically, two really beautiful super models acting out together and looking at the camera alot is for men.are both women in highheels, lotta makeup, long ass fingernails ...
... meaning this would be targeted to the male audience. Basically, two really beautiful super models acting out together and looking at the camera alot is for men.are both women in highheels, lotta makeup, long ass fingernails ...
for me the no no on lesbian sites is when they have mega long fingernails that most of us that have HAD lesbian sex is unrealistic if you are going to be using those fingers in anywhere fun.
I have often wondered what would happen if the magazine On Our Backs did a Suicide Girls type of community.
exactly...get your face in there girl. If you can't you don't belong there in the first place.Originally posted by Bec
and looking at the camera alot is for men.
http://www.cyber-dyke.net/
I've always thought this one was interesting.
Is anyone familiar with it?
Topbuxom lee
Director of Marketing
Topbucks/Pluginfeeds
Yeah that's the one Bec was talking about I think. Now .. to my untrained eye.. THAT looks like a full on true lesbian site!Originally posted by Topbuckslee
http://www.cyber-dyke.net/
I've always thought this one was interesting.
Is anyone familiar with it?
Ah, my oops - forgot the dang dash, so yes, it's still live and kicking and yes - THAT is FOR lesbian women.Originally posted by Squirt
Yeah that's the one Bec was talking about I think. Now .. to my untrained eye.. THAT looks like a full on true lesbian site!
Originally posted by sarahwebinc
exactly...get your face in there girl. If you can't you don't belong there in the first place.
LMAOPIMP ... thanks for the chuckle!
?? Sarah will you be going to Internext Expo - Vegas Jan. 4-6, 2005 ??
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
teasin you...
but... will you ??
the Cyber-Dyke.net site looks NICE....
~Bell
p.s. if long fingernails get in my way they still look NICE holding purchased "thangs" and my tongue doesn't scratch...
my nose doesn't either....
so there.... (sticking up for the Lipstick-Lesbos-Is-My-Mission... smile...)
What do you think the insurgance of these straight owned campaigns for adult Gay business is going to bring?
Will they flood our market like they have the straight market or will our Gay surfers catch on and avoid the cookie cutter sites like the plague?
sarahwebinc - it's not just sites that are abusive to bbw's. pretty much every mainstream porn company's movies are named things like horny hippos. because they are uncomfortable with bigger women, they assume everyone is - but when you buy print mags, and read the readers letters, they think the women are lovely and sexy. obviously nothing in porn has a hint what the potential paying members want.
the same with mature sites, usually. the guys who make them don't care for mature women so they call 40 year olds grannies and try and show 32 year olds they can call mature.
if you're selling to a market, you should keep in mind that the market you're selling TO really likes what they like - even if you don't.
i'm not sure the lesbian sites are aimed at views' tastes. this is all straight men are offered, so it could be more what porn directors THINK straight men want - or what the porn companies want.
i sure don't care for lesbo101. from the title - i don't care for the term "lesbo", this site holds no appeal for me at all.
you know what i see in all these sites? the girl with her back to the camera is more interested in showing us her pussy than turning on the woman she's with. and most of those girls can barely stand to touch a pussy with their tongue extended fully - with the very tip of their tongues, i might add. if you don't like the taste, get out a vibrator and give your partner a good time, i say!
but the bottom line with all the fake lesbian content is that it's ONLY about turning on men, not the other person in the video.
Originally posted by Bell
?? Sarah will you be going to Internext Expo - Vegas Jan. 4-6, 2005 ??
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
LOL....
teasin you...
but... will you ??
the Cyber-Dyke.net site looks NICE....
~Bell
p.s. if long fingernails get in my way they still look NICE holding purchased "thangs" and my tongue doesn't scratch...
my nose doesn't either....
so there.... (sticking up for the Lipstick-Lesbos-Is-My-Mission... smile...)
I don't know yet, I hope so but I haven't been told anything by work.
well, as a straight guy marketing a gay site, I have to say I agree and disagree with a lot of what's been said on this thread. First of all, we can't generalize and categorize people or companies as there are so many different companies and individuals selling gay content out there, some are straight, lots are gay. We can't just say, "hey straight guys, you don't know what you're doing, 'cause you're not gay, so stop ripping us off with your nice glossy coverered, but crappy content site."
One thing is sure, it's a good idea to have at least one gay guy around if you're looking to create, promote and sell a gay guy site.
But what is a "straight owned company"? One who's boss is straight and all employees are straight and who are promoting gay sites? Or , a company who's boss is straight, and everyone else except for one guy who's gay and who's responsable for the site. Again, it's unclear and each individual company has it's story. But in general, I agree that attacking the gay market with no gay people in the company, who've no interest or respect for the gay market, in an aim to make some loot using a minimum amount of content is a sad but real fact of today's industry.
That said there's gotta be lots of gay sites out there created by open minded straight people who just know what the gay market want and know how to deliver it and make money from it, and ain't nothing wrong with that.
:baby:
exactly. When I look for BBW sites to promote there are two things that will make me decide for sure not to offer it to my sufers. Firstly, if it has a title which is insulting - hippo,etc..fatty depends on how it is used but usually that is bad too. The second one is if they just feel the need to throw a cartoon style doughnut or slice of pizza into the design. Read any magazine targetted at the BBW/FA community and the pure love and lust felt towards BBWs by their 'fans' is evident and that is the same in any community based on attraction to a body type or fetish.Originally posted by basschick
sarahwebinc - it's not just sites that are abusive to bbw's. pretty much every mainstream porn company's movies are named things like horny hippos. because they are uncomfortable with bigger women, they assume everyone is - but when you buy print mags, and read the readers letters, they think the women are lovely and sexy. obviously nothing in porn has a hint what the potential paying members want.
You know who else needs to be in this thread? Pam. She deals with the same things with her hairy sites.
hey squirt,
hit me up on ICQ, I'd love to see if we could do business together !
:high:
I absolutely agree .... and this board is supportive and welcoming of anyone producing gay sites, regardless of their personal orientation. But the key to the whole thing is in where you make the statement that they "know what the gay market wants and know how to deliver it".That said there's gotta be lots of gay sites out there created by open minded straight people who just know what the gay market want and know how to deliver it and make money from it, and ain't nothing wrong with that.
We've all seen sites that are tossed together with images of guys and labeled "gay", and no clue on terminology, niches, lifestyle and so on, and a lot of the people doing this aren't comfortable in coming to a board like this one to really get a "clue" about how to do it right. If they aren't comfortable in getting educated about a niche or market, gay or otherwise, then in my opinion, they have no business cluttering up the web with a site featuring it.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks