Secondary producers having to keep age docs does not kick in at the end of next month. It's in effect right now and actually has been for years.

Everything relating to secondary producers being required to keep age docs in the new regs is a COPY AND PASTE from the old regs. Nothing new here.

Even when the draft of the new regs was published a year ago, they stated that who they effected was not changing.

So this brings up questions.

Where was this panic 3, 4, 5... years ago?

Why did we never see industry lawyers saying that THOUSANDS of secondary producers were in violation?