Of course not.. that's obsurd. That's like saying owning a knife means you're automatically guilty of stabbing someone to death if accused. :wacko:Originally Posted by Lee
Exactly. I believe in our court sytem. It worked for me, thank God. No public lynching. The key here is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and the moment the mother took the stand and testified.. there was reasonable doubt. When her dubious past came into light.. there was resaonable doubt.Originally Posted by Lee
Right... because common sense tells you that you don't want you child around a man that has pictures of naked boys playing and laying together, touching eachother, nore would you want any children you know sleeping with him.Originally Posted by Lee
They didn't claim Jackson Innocent beyond a reasonable doubt.. they found that there is reasonable doubt he didn't do it.
I think she'll have her hands full with the state welfare system and JC Penny hopefullyOriginally Posted by Lee
. I know when my case was thrown out I could have sued, and won, against the school district, the psycho who took me to court, and an insurance company.. but I just wanted it done. 9 months worrying about if the system will work, getting evidence, taped depositions, TV interviews etc etc.. you just want to get back to normal period. That's why I initially came to Australia.. to recharge my batteries. I wonder where Michael Jackson will go? What do you think he'll do?




. I know when my case was thrown out I could have sued, and won, against the school district, the psycho who took me to court, and an insurance company.. but I just wanted it done. 9 months worrying about if the system will work, getting evidence, taped depositions, TV interviews etc etc.. you just want to get back to normal period. That's why I initially came to Australia.. to recharge my batteries. I wonder where Michael Jackson will go? What do you think he'll do?
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks