Quote Originally Posted by BDBionic
Just as "fag" appears on that site - within the context of a point the authors are trying to make through satire and parody.

It's precisely that the authors of that site know people use "fag" in hateful ways that they suggested if some absurdly right wing policy of abstinence-only geared at American teenagers would go so far as to use the word "fag".

Yes I got that and the use of ****** would have the same impact as the right wing is nutoriously racist and their perceived overpopulation of unemployed "blacks" would indicate that "sex is for niggers"

You get it?

FAG is acceptable to make such a public paradoy of, ****** isn't.

Substitute the word Lesbian for FAG and it's not as funny... why? Because the use of the word FAG induces images of a negative stereotype we have to live with every day.

Like I said, his text was funny, but his use of the word FAG wasn't just satire and parody, otherwise he would have certainly used the word ******. But NIGGERS aren't funny and FAGS are HA HA HA HA HA HA HA :coffee:

Quote Originally Posted by BDBionic
I wonder what your views on freedom of expression and speech are if the presence of a word itself is all that matters. What about context? Does it not matter at all?
I don't care what he says. He can say whatever he wants. Context matters as I explained above, it matters very much.