I find it ironic that the people, in case after case, decide in favor of free speech. Judges continuously rule in favor of free speech. Yet, taxpayers money is going toward agents whos single directive, from the top, will be to find cases where they can set free speech back?

I find it funny watching Gonzales and Bush falling over themselves to make church people happy by pulling agents off important cases where the law HAS been broken, to try and set free speeh back. If I was an agent I'd be pissed that people in my position were being used to work against the constitution instead of really helping society.

If something that's legal doesn't sell, people will stop creating it. It's pretty simple. I don't see the big deal. AND if a communities standards were against the content, people in the community wouldn't be buying it, right? :francais: