Quote Originally Posted by boyfunk
Who do you want to believe? Who has better credibility?
Right now, the injured party has the more plausable story, remember that thing we call 'innocent until proven guilty'?

Let me spell it out, the model has LOT to gain if these allegations are true or false, his attorney has a lot to gain, if these allegations are true, the studio has nothing to gain if the allegations are true, they are the injured party here, the victims if you like.

Not one of the three parties involved is any more credible than the other two yet, at the same time, the only ones who are actually 'doing' anything about it worth a damn, at the present time, are Cobra by starting legal action against the model, they must feel they are in the clear for starting the legal action.

I cant think of any reason a company who knowingly produced child porn (by its very definition) would go to court to argue that they produced such materials and that the model is in the wrong unless, they know something that WE dont and again, going back to what i said earlier, this case has 4 sides to the story and we'll never get to know them all.

If the model had a solid case, im pretty sure that the Feds would have been involved by now and we would have heard something about Cobra being charged with distributing child porn. As it stands, we havent.

That, to me, says a lot.

Also again, we know for a fact that this model has at least once alledgedly provided forged documents to prove his age, whats to say the documents his attorney has are not also forgeries? Nothing.

Regards,

Lee