"I commend you for your responsible actions and the time and effort you have put into making your choice. Certainly, that choice is yours to make and I respect that. And truthfully, I enjoy viewing bareback porn myself...but just as truthfully, how many webmasters do you think are as responsible as yourself? Not many. Most just put the images out there and leave it at that."

Jason,

I totally agree. Most webmasters don't bother. In fact, when so many webmasters out there are stealing images and traffic from one another, how could we expect those same people to act responsibly in other areas?

And since we're having this very good moral and ethical discussion, one might also ask people to consider the use of the word "boy and "teen." In the grand scheme of things, is there really any difference in not promoting unsafe sex sites, but then, turning around and pumping traffic to a "boy" site, where the models look precariously under age? Aren't people still getting hurt?

The dilemma I had was that bareback galleries sell very well on my site, so I certainly didn't want to lose that revenue, but I also felt morally obliged to make some kind of a statement about HIV and safer sex.

At any rate, Jason, I wasn't the least bit offended with anything you had to say. I think it's important that we have this discussion. And I'm hoping others will join in the discussion and add their thoughts on the whole "boy" thing.

Cheers
Dzinerbear