They most definitely still sell. That there are so many producers out there doing well with twink content is all the proof needed of that.

I don't see it as a problem when someone simply isn't turned on by a particular thing or doesn't quite see how it can be appealing. But it does kind of bug me when people condemn others for being turned on by entirely legal things involving consenting adults. There's a fine line between not agreeing and judging.

I've met plenty a 30yo who doesn't do themselves any favors by carrying through with their own decisions. Shall we start having aptitude tests to determine who can and can not be a model in this industry?

Saying that it should be illegal for a young looking 18+yo to do porn because they just look too underage... well... isn't Alberto Gonzalez and the Justice Dept. attempting to regulate that exact thing?

People spend way too much time trying to identify some character flaw that sits at the root of sexual tastes or attribute what turns people on to some kinda of personality defect or mental/emotional failing.

[facetious]
Do gay guys who are turned on by hairy bears have some concept of the masculine ideal that is rooted in their own insecurities and self esteem issues over being gay and hence unacceptibly non-masculine?

Do bottoms have some warped gender identity issue that makes them pursue what their subconscious interprets as the more feminine role in sex, i.e. to be penetrated vs. penetrating?

Are tops attempting to overcompensate for the fact that they're not heterosexual?

And what about those leather sling bondage sites? That just stinks of self hatred and some unhealthy need to either humiliate or be humiliated!!
[/facetious]

I mean goodness, we could come up with all kinds of random crap.

Live and let live. There need not be anything wrong with tastes different than your own. Different is just different. Not bad.