Quote Originally Posted by CorbinFisher_BD
I don't see it as a problem when someone simply isn't turned on by a particular thing or doesn't quite see how it can be appealing. But it does kind of bug me when people condemn others for being turned on by entirely legal things involving consenting adults. There's a fine line between not agreeing and judging.
I agree with you 100%. The original poster of this runs a tgp and gets many submissions. I run a link list and get many twink sites submitted.

I myself have always been labeled twinkish. Just the other day I was trading pics and the other guy said you are two twink looking.

My main beef as that the competition in the twink category is intense. For sites to attract new members they resort to creating fantasies that are very borderline.

An example is a banner for hmboys w/ 2 very young models and its says when the parent are away the boys will play. Or what about these school boy secrets sites. Or even what does the hs in hsboys stand for? high school?

If you just put up a link and say click here for hsboys.com, Many a surfer will click thinking they are getting pics of highschool boys.

I have AVS sites submitted to me with a young looking boy and names like after school jerk off. "Ryan was so horny after football practice that when he got home and found no one there he had to bla bla bla...."

I BELIEVE that in the porn industry there was one or two lawsuits where studios were sued not because they had under age model but because they put models in a situation where a fantasy was created that was inapproiate. An extreme example would be release a porn title called Junior High Fuck Buddies. Even if the models are all 18, you are creating an underage fantasy.

I just feel that many of the twink sites are doing this type of marketing/branding. And with the justin dude and the cobra brat it's just bringing attention to a market that by it's own way of marketing/branding is already hurting itself.

But lets face it a banner that says when mom and dad are away the boys will play pull better than a banner that say click here for the hottest 18-21 years old on the net.

Does what I say make sense?

I mean who is to say IF the justice department goes to one of my link list, goes to a site that had legal content, but follows a link to a mega twink site that is not 2257 compliant and gets charged in a lawsuit, technically I am responsible for linking to that site (indirectly).

And more and more I am seeing this type of underage fantasies being portrayed. schoolboy secrets, mom and dad away, afterschool jerk off, etc etc.

It's not the twinks or my taste in twinks that turn me off from the twink market. It's how site owners are portraying them and the marketing methods they use. IMHO THEY are the ones that exploiting the youthful appearance of twinks in ways that are borderline ethical.