Quote Originally Posted by maxpower
Personally I think your way over thinking content, it should look good as far as lighting, but its just content no one really wants true reality that sucks. People only watch that stuff for like 5-10 minuets then go on with their life. Good looking models, a good 3-5 minuet set-up, lighting, editing and a hard core edge are a must for really good videos but that is about it. People only want to see augmented reality not real reality.:china:
Personally, I would call that average or "mediocre" content, not necessarily "good content," Max. To me that sounds just like the content that everyone else is doing. I acknowledge that my standards are much higher than the norm, but I think you'd be surprised how many people I talk to who think like I do. Interestingly enough, they're the people who WATCH it, not necessarily those who MAKE it. Interesting disconnect that I see. I wonder why that is...

I also think that audiences have been trained to ask for less, b/cuz porn people got lazy and started offering less, especially in the '80s. A lot of people will say "Why should I strive any higher than what I can convert off of?" and I always want to say, "Because you can, and because it will make you stand out from everyone else."

Sure, you can slap together some decent-looking content and offer it on your site and get people to join. My question, though, is: Why NOT strive higher than that?