marcjacob - true enough, but there are sites webmasters promote where the guys look very obviously underage and processors in the u.s. have refused to process for those sites.

sure, a 19 year old could look 17 or 16 although he'd usually attain certain physical signs of maturity. but a site full of guys who all look 14 and are 18+ strains my credibility past the breaking point. and i feel sure that it would strain any judge's credibility in the same way.

the people who support those sites because of the i.d. given might want to keep in mind that in court they can have an expert examine those scans and determine if the dates have been altered.