Hmm.. Interesting Dilemma...

[maxpower]

This is the same mentality that some in our community have. They are the ones that blast out large amounts of sites with recycled content and one page tours and network with other sites and programs that do the same.

A good movie stands the test of time whereas a hyped up hollywood clone will be a flash in the pan, the same goes for porn sites, for the most part.

Max people are not buying the package, they are buying the product. If all people wanted was the package then there is no need for the product. Adult websites are selling a product first and foremost, adult content.

You can have a very simple, inexpensive, very effective web design and kick ass content, and be very successful (trust me I know).

It's easy to update a site design, content is an investment that is a one time deal for each video. Do you understand what I'm saying? You don't have to agree, I just want to make sure you understand.

I do know what you are saying, but the content in the tour/outside is very limited

I was just saying its better to start with a really good sales tool, now I never said good content is not important, but sales has to be above even that. If you have the sales you can go out and get more or make more content, but with out sales you only have the content and no money. I would never say content is worthless its #3 on my list, but even with 20 year old content if you have 1 & 2 you will be ok, but with the best content in the world if you do not have good 1 & 2 you are fucked

(1) Traffic
(2) Convertibility “tour”
(3) Content

What we where supposed to be talking about is really high-end, large well made professionally tours, not this stuff that look like some guy in a garage made over a week-end, spent a whole 600$ on it, or cranking out tours that look more like ½ page ads than members sites. I look at a web site like a book, I know people say don’t judge a book by its cover, but you know most people do. If you want to sell a book you had better have really good word of mouth about that book “like its been around 20 years or something” or a cover that will make someone pick it up off the shelf. You can have the hottest guys in the world, but if they are inside a password protected site and all you can see is a crap tour with a few hot guys in square frames with a little text not many people will ever pay to see what’s on the inside and to get people to join sites it what we do, or should be doing.

[Squirt]

I do know what you are saying....

Ok great just wanted to make sure it got through :scissors: :balls:

[maxpower]

Ok great just wanted to make sure it got through :scissors: :balls:

LOL ya I got you man, and it cool if you think that way I just don’t. I know that it has worked in the past for a few site that have photographers running all over the planet, that also BTW give really good Bios in the tours about the models to go with a VERY limited design. I just don’t think that is a grate model to try to follow for most people is all.

[spazlabz]

here is an interesting side to this dilemma thread... I have seen it argued back and forth between different people that crappy designs, both on galleries and tours sell better, and then there is the opposite argument that high quality design lends towards the credibility of the high quality of the site as a whole, content included.
Both arguments are valid but IMO when I see a gorgeous thumbnail and then watch a very hot video geared towards a fantasy I have, I want to see more.. page layout be damned show me some flesh!

spaz

[basschick]

but truly bad tours don't show flesh. truly bad tours are bad tours

if you don't know that wonderful movie is playing in that terrible theater, you sure wouldn't bother to go there. and if the theater has a bad screen and awful sound, it may not be a rewarding experience.

[gaystoryman]

Call me thick or absent minded or even blonde, but where is all this crappy tours coming from?

I mean the question being put is does a person spend a shit load on exclusive content or on a super duper site design. That's the question, now where does it say that if the person spends the cash on content he is going to settle for a crap design? :offtopic:

While I'd agree that if the person spends a small fortune on exclusive content then buys a shit design, he/she is pretty lame and it won't be to their advantage, but lets give the person some credit for having brains, as they are trying to choose where to invest the bulk of their capital into.

Sort of like going Christmas shopping. You naturally will try to spend the most on something special for your special partner, but does it mean you forget keeping enough aside for the others you have to get gifts for? I don't think so.

[basschick]

the question was whether to

"choose to invest in design work or, choose to invest in exclusive content?"

so actually this is a one or the other question. my answer is both. i feel that there is no reason to choose one or the other.

now where does it say that if the person spends the cash on content he is going to settle for a crap design? :offtopic:

[sexyd]

Have you ever gone to a really shitty movie theatre to see a film you know you wanted to see?

Have you ever been to a dodgy video rental store and rented a movie you wanted to see?

Don't get me wrong... nice looks really help a lot when selling something but at the end of the day you're not buying the package, you're buying the product.

i have and therefore agree :fugly:

[Squirt]

i have and therefore agree :fugly:

ha ha ha!

You have a PM from me SexyD :worm: