-
On the other hand.... You have different fingers
For me (and I think AJ will concur on most of this) and for us as a company, anything that's degrading/humiliating to the model is not OK, and obviously anything that would likely fail the Miller test is "over the line" for me.
I wouldn't argue with another webmaster's right to produce it on First Amendment grounds, but I wouldn't want to be involved in producing or distributing it.
Max, read about the Miller test and you'll understand what the definition of "obscenity" is that we as an industry have to follow. Whether or not you like it or agree with it is irrelevant. Your attitude may sound nice, but it's BS. My guess is that your willingness to fight back will fly out the window when the Feds come waving a 50 year jail sentence in your face and you're looking at a quarter million bucks to defend yourself. I'm guessing you'd be the first to take a guilty plea to a lesser offense.
Until you've had your tangles with the system and particularly the bills to go along with them (and I'm not talking about $500 for a lawyer to show up to cop a deal on a drunk driving citation, a speeding ticket, or a shoplifting charge) you really have no idea how the system actually works. Once you do, your attitude changes considerably.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks