so far none of what is going on between the fsc and the doj is binding - so says the articles i read. heck, even the actual court order hasn't been binding so casual discussions on paper and tentative agreements that have not been signed, sealed and delivered will be wide open for change before they are solid.

worst case scenario is that precedent is what will finally clarify things - which means someone or several someones will be indicted and jailed and tried in order to define things.


Quote Originally Posted by gaybucks_chip View Post
The "located outside the US" clarification is in writing, it's in correspondence between FSC and Justice over the issues raised concerning the injunction. I should *think* that Justice would have a hard time denying the interpretation given in writing by one of its staff acting with apparent authority in communicating with the FSC.

However, as to whether it really is binding or not... who knows? I agree with Patti that it would definitely be wise to get a consult with one of the adult industry specialists on the issue and, ideally, something in writing from them. At least if you show you acted with due diligence on advice from counsel, you're less likely to have problems even if Justice tries to later change the rules.