Quote Originally Posted by gaydemon View Post
Ok, to make this a bit more interesting. I have now removed all references to "scat".

However I still have a watersports category and will remain where it is.

I would like to find out how Epoch / Paycom can justify a rule which is against the use of certain words, while being more than willing to process payments for a site that actually feature such content. (Again no offence to you Bill or HDK - i really like the stuff you make!)

So its now:

1. Gaydemon - Words only
2. HDK - Content only

Does Epoch / Paycom try to tell us that words are far worse and more dangerous than the action of doing it / the real content?

By the way, isn’t Feltching going pretty close to Scat? HDK got that as a category.. How does one decide what’s ok by paycom? Is it certain body fluids or orifices?
Bjorn,

Again, it isn't the words....it is the content. Do you links to scat or watersports link to site that actually show scat or watersports. If you look at our site, with one exception, which is being corrected as we speak, we don't mention the word watersports or piss, or pissing or urnination, nor do we mention it in any of our video descriptions or photos. For that reason, VISA would not know if a film contained it or not. And, keep in mind, it isn't Paycom who created the rules, they apparently came from VISA.

As I mentioned earlier, we received a notification from our online merchant account quite a while back, that if they or VISA were to discover that we had any content which depicted watersports, or what they called, "urination", our merchant account would be closed immediately and without notice.

So it isn't just the words. It is the content if it is shown. The words just make VISA and Epoch and CCBill look further until they find the content.

Bill