If you're referring to this article that you posted
http://citizensvoice.com/site/news.c...d=455154&rfi=6
nowhere in it is it said or implied that they were at Bryan's house that night. It does say, as I referenced earlier, that they had *information* about someone who was to model with Bryan that night... but that information (as previously reported in another article) came from a phonecall Sean had with Bryan.
Now... if it does turn out that Grant and Sean were there the night of the murder, then that changes things considerably.
As I or anyone else with an ounce of sense would, regardless of innocence, if I were in their circumstances (which is exactly what I said in the previous message.)They, Sean (Brent) and friend, are refusing to talk with the police until their attorney sets up a meeting and is present.
Apparently you don't know what "simultaneously" means. Until the laws of physics change, it's not currently possible to be in two places at the same time.As for you comment about it being difficult to do the 2,000 miles simultaneously first it's actually about 2,800 miles, and that is easy to do in a 24 hour period.
"Snarky" doesn't have a perfect synonym, but the closest would be rudely sarcastic, disrespectful, or snide. I make a few snarky comments on GWW myselfNow, explain to me, what the hell "snarky" is. I'm justa poor country boy and don't understand those big words.
Not trying to be snotty or disrespectful to you here. I'm just saying... none of the parties on either side of the dispute are angels, there was a lot of nastiness exchanged during the suit, a man was brutally murdered days after, but indications are that the contentious lawsuit had been settled to the satisfaction of both parties. So before we rush into making accusations at people that were likely thousands of miles away and had nothing to do with the murder, let's wait and see what the police come up with.







Reply With Quote
Bookmarks