What is the point of that question? Are you implying that there is an economics of scale here? This reminds me of the earlier discussion regarding Corbin Fisher not wanting "onezies / twozies" affiliates. You are paying on performance....PLUS receiving branding by people reading your name.Originally Posted by Lee
Okay then, please define 'good affiliate' in your opinion?
10 sales a week? 20 sales a week? 30 sales a week?
Im really interested in finding out what you classify a 'good' affiliate
Regards, Lee
In any kind of business, there is a "cost to acquire a customer." It could be the money you pay a magazine to run your print ad, or the money you pay affiliates.
In a related tangent, perhaps you shouldn't fall into the adult industry's weird method of dehumaizing its customers (i.e. refer to them not as humans but "traffic") Note JustUsBoys or Xtube were invoked earlier as impressive performers for sending websites business.... and why might that be? Maybe one reason they are effective is because they have "members" ..... not dehumanized nanites in the matrix.
Steve
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks