Hey Maxpower,

First off, thanks for the submissions.

The reason those two sites where rejected is the use of "Teen", "Boy", and "Teen Boy" in the titles and descriptions. Please feel free to change those words, or make an alternative version without them for us and we will be happy to list it.

With the use of those words and with the guys looking so young, it could be implied pretty easily that the models may have not been the proper age to be in porn. We are just a bit sensitive that that issue.

Thanks!
Andy


Quote Originally Posted by maxpower View Post
I must say I am a bit excited I sent 4 sites to JUB and 2 were accepted and 2 where rejected. I am not sure which of our JUB board members are a “Links Manager” but would love to prefect these sites or just know what the real problem was with other 2 sites. If you happen to have anything to do with the approval process for JUB please PM me so I hope we can work this out. :maxpower:

What started all this was my yearly traffic tests in which JUB free site traffic is up almost 50% over last year (around 450 hits in the first month each free site) I would suggest everyone take another look at JUB now if you do not have them in your link package. Not that its a huge amount of traffic or anything, but sounds like it might me worth another look.