Quote Originally Posted by BradShaw View Post
Because we shootly mostly non condom stuff.
Well, the way I see it, you're not "bad" for the market at all. The market itself knows no such thing as morals or ethics. Money is money. Just ask any web producer who produces straight-guy niche content. They will usually tell you they don't have many concerns about what kind of a message straight-guy content sends to gay men; it's about the money. People want to see it, therefor they offer it. That's just simple economics: supply-and-demand.

That much has to be acknowledged. It also should be acknowledged that you are offering content to people who share your views on condoms in porn, and they have just as much a right to view the content they wish to see as those who prefer to see content shot with condoms.

However, the question remains whether or not your content is "bad" for the gay community, and that, my friend, is another story entirely. That would depend on whether or not you feel it is important to promote safer sex in adult content.

By the way, I hate using terms like "bad" and "good" when it comes to topics like this one. I prefer to stick to more constructive terms, and just view a situation for what it is rather than make moral assumptions about what kind of people produce certain kinds of content. I leave that to those moral grandstanders who think themselves better than everyone else.