Quote Originally Posted by tonysparks View Post
I had the same problem when I was going through compliance with CCbill for Dirtytony. They claimed their issue was not the fact that we don't own the content--it's that we don't have control over the content. If we market the site as having the bonus content, then the bonus site goes down, it would technically be false advertising.

It's really a ridiculous policy, and I think part of it is CCbill trying to require sites to have them as (at least a secondary) processor. They want the bonus content providers to signup with them for membership services. Not really a great way to go about getting business--imho.

-TS
i just talked to epoch, they say they dont take those as well, wtf?