Controversial Topic: Young Looking Models

[maxpower]

Wow I am not going to super impose some special standard on gay content that str8 content proviers do not even see as a issue. You know how many str8 teen gild sites have (teddy bear, lipop or have an old man with a young girls) This whole thing is insanity when you get the 5000 str8 teen girl members sites to stop doing that, Then come talk too me.

Not that I use any of these things as of yet, but I am not going to limit my or your rights to express content at least in the same ways as the str8 market does. WFT are you guys talking about? Why does every group always think they are more ricottas or more ethical than another. If you ask me its all PORN

Can we not at least be equals here at the bottom of the barrel?

[gaybucks_chip]

Sean,

No one's putting you down, and if you took my comments that way, I'm sorry, not what I intended.

All I was saying is that, for our own peace of mind, we produce all of our own content and therefore don't have to worry about whether some photog somewhere took a shortcut.

Doesn't mean we'd be immune to a model with an exceptionally good fake ID - that's happened to some of the best companies - but we just felt that, since we were already a little "edgy", taking the precautions of being able to examine IDs in person reduces the risk slightly. There are several excellent content brokers who I would trust to supply a good product, just that it's one area that we choose to be a little more conservative about.

btw, more ricottas? As in cheesy?

[maxpower]

Sean,

No one's putting you down, and if you took my comments that way, I'm sorry, not what I intended.

All I was saying is that, for our own peace of mind, we produce all of our own content and therefore don't have to worry about whether some photog somewhere took a shortcut.

Doesn't mean we'd be immune to a model with an exceptionally good fake ID - that's happened to some of the best companies - but we just felt that, since we were already a little "edgy", taking the precautions of being able to examine IDs in person reduces the risk slightly. There are several excellent content brokers who I would trust to supply a good product, just that it's one area that we choose to be a little more conservative about.

btw, more ricottas? As in cheesy?

Was not talking about you man, just getting up on my soap box is all. To tell the truth you post was so long I did not read much of it but will now though. Not that I think its a bad thing to have long posts but I have drank to much coffee to read many long posts.

I know it was cheesy, the whole “I have a dream thing” but I can be a cheese ball sometimes. And I do think shooting plushy stuff could be really fun.

[IdolKnights]

btw, more ricottas? As in cheesy?

heh...

[IdolKnights]

Max,

Some lines shouldn't be crossed.

Meaning: IF the model is of age but looks underage - you don't project them into looking even younger AND have them in sexual situations.

[maxpower]

Max,

Some lines shouldn't be crossed.

Meaning: IF the model is of age but looks underage - you don't project them into looking even younger AND have them in sexual situations.

See I don’t know, I hate to draw lines with LEGAL content to me this negates the LEGAL part.

I think using twinks in plushy content could be really expressive, and all the color and items like stuffed purple snakes would create something visually appealing. Content like this is normally just for fun and really pretty artistic in some cases, not really about CP, or really hard-core themes at all.

As far as the “sexual situations” last time I checked this was PORN forum right? I think they have people that are into art photos someplace LOL

[IdolKnights]

As far as the “sexual situations” last time I checked this was PORN forum right? I think they have people that are into art photos someplace LOL

Was it not you who just said:

Content like this is normally just for fun and really pretty artistic in some cases

funny, looked like it was just in the same post too.

Sorry but I fail to see reason behind your posts. You don't read and admit you don't read based on "too long" but instead, form an opinion as if you did read something. A HALF ASS OPINION BASED ON ASSUMPTION for that matter.

[gaybucks_chip]

Sean,

I think the point he's making is don't take a barely-18 guy and put him in a setting that makes him look much younger.

You can do interesting, colorful backgrounds that in no way imply younger than 18... anything from colorful furniture to comforters, outdoor settings, etc can contribute to a more interesting scene than one shot in a generic hotel room.

But if you instead choose to take your barely-18 model, dress him up in a middle school uniform, put Algebra 1 textbooks next to him, and Power Rangers or Sesame Street stuffed animals or whatever in the scene, any reasonable person is going to infer from that setting that the kid is underage, or you want people to *think* the kid is underage. That is the line that shouldn't be crossed.

You can argue that it is *legal* but that isn't a battle I would want to fight with Aunt Minnie in Cletusville, TN on the jury. (BTW, I'd make the exact same argument in straight porn for taking a barely 18 girl and dressing her up in a similar way)

Of course, it's up to you. But if you get too close to the line, you invite scrutiny, and you also have a hard time getting affilaites to promote your site.

[maxpower]

Sean,

I think the point he's making is don't take a barely-18 guy and put him in a setting that makes him look much younger.

You can do interesting, colorful backgrounds that in no way imply younger than 18... anything from colorful furniture to comforters, outdoor settings, etc can contribute to a more interesting scene than one shot in a generic hotel room.

But if you instead choose to take your barely-18 model, dress him up in a middle school uniform, put Algebra 1 textbooks next to him, and Power Rangers or Sesame Street stuffed animals or whatever in the scene, any reasonable person is going to infer from that setting that the kid is underage, or you want people to *think* the kid is underage. That is the line that shouldn't be crossed.

You can argue that it is *legal* but that isn't a battle I would want to fight with Aunt Minnie in Cletusville, TN on the jury. (BTW, I'd make the exact same argument in straight porn for taking a barely 18 girl and dressing her up in a similar way)

Of course, it's up to you. But if you get too close to the line, you invite scrutiny, and you also have a hard time getting affilaites to promote your site.

I hate to think about lines, while Sesame Street does take things too far (have seen some underwear with that on it) to tell the truth I like the Power Rangers idea that could be fun LOL

Everyone knows these guys are not 4 years old, and do not have pacifiers, or blankes, or play with stuff animals. Not sure anyone believes that is reality. Yet its not like I am going to make plushy site tomorrow even though it might still be fun to do.

I really just don’t like limiting my options when I create themes for sites or in the future videos. This is one of the best things about porn is the freedom, not much more they can do to you after your seen in the “XXX” crowd anyway.

Someone always going to push limits, in you want to stop this the only way to the start the game over on a bigger field. But yet I would be the first to find that “line” and bitching about it probably