Originally Posted by
chubbs
As much as I would like to believe this was a huge conspiricy, mainly cause I love that shit, this is not. Yes there is plenty of ammo for the theorists to use when coming up with what seem to be legitimate ideas. But lets be real, this was no conspiricy. A bunch of whack job arab'a got together a while back and planned this. Using a bunch of Saudi cock suckers that had been planted here in the states for years they easily pulled of what many terrorists have been wanting to do. Yes there were a lot of unusual happenings that day such as other buildings collapsing. But you gotta realize the magnitude of what happened. 2 GIANT building came crashing down with no warning. I mean, have you ever seen the twin towers in person? I have and its almost impossible to grasp how big/tall they were without having seen them. I am suprised that there were not more unusual, unexplainable events that occured. I am suprised noone has mentioned the unique lung destroying "dust" that was created when all the different materials (paper, steel, plastic, concrete, etc) were superheated from the friction of the collapse and then compressed with insane force.
If it is possivle for a powder/dust to be created by the collapse that has NEVER been seen before, why is it so hard to believe other building fell due to circumstances noone can even imagine? Or was that fallout from the nukes that n. koreans has planted in the surrounding buildings?
Let me just ask you this, was the 1st WTC attack a conspiricy too? No. But I bet if the towers had fallen that day you'd be calling it one.
--Chubbs
Bookmarks