Over the past few months I have been working on a review site, adding features that some might consider makes it more blog-like in nature.
Like many affiliates, I get emails offering imagery to assist in marketing. I usually visit the website tours to garnish text to augment the image presentation.
I am amazed at the number of typographical errors I have been seeing recently with a few sites. Take MEN AT PLAY for example:
"When it comes to working under Carlos' command, its it's generally accepted that there is zero tolerance for any cocky behaviour. So when Glenn sets his sights on him, he finds that his sexual games are not welcome by the strict boss and doesnt doesn't quite get the reaction he usually gets from other guys. Instead Gelnn Glenn finds himself in the receiving end of a hard but suprisingly surprisingly erotic spanking, from Carlos' firm hand. With the tables truned turned and the power restored Carlos proceeds to work on Glenns Glenn's perfectly muscular ass, as he pulls down his trousers and gives his tight virgin hole a rimming he will never forget."
There are many quality sites like Corbin Fisher that I have never seen a mistake.
With a site like Men at Play, are they rushing their updates too quickly without a proof reader? Or is the text just a decoration and rather a burden?
Bookmarks