Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: When underage porn is forgiven

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    On the other hand.... You have different fingers
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,548
    And... the problem is, as long as it's just flashing breasts, the Feds can't do anything under 2257, because it isn't a violation. They can rightfully claim they are "in 2257 compliance" and still have a bunch of underage girls flashing their boobs.

    The guy is definitely sleazy. Be interesting to see if a bunch of his then-inebriated victims could create a class action.


  2. #2
    Xstr8guy
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by gaybucks_chip View Post
    And... the problem is, as long as it's just flashing breasts, the Feds can't do anything under 2257, because it isn't a violation. They can rightfully claim they are "in 2257 compliance" and still have a bunch of underage girls flashing their boobs.
    Don't any of you guys have the TV on late at night? GGW hasn't been only about tittie flashing for years now. I haven't actually watched any of their videos but the commercials sure make it look pretty hardcore to me... girl/girl sex scenes seem to be pretty common and I think they have boy/girl as well.


  3. #3
    On the other hand.... You have different fingers
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Xstr8guy View Post
    Don't any of you guys have the TV on late at night? GGW hasn't been only about tittie flashing for years now. I haven't actually watched any of their videos but the commercials sure make it look pretty hardcore to me... girl/girl sex scenes seem to be pretty common and I think they have boy/girl as well.
    I suspect that the deal is they keep 2257 records for the explicit stuff, and no records for the nonexplicit stuff. Their index page for girlsgonewild.com isn't even compliant! There's no 2257 notice until you get inside the site, and they have language indicating that some of their content is exempt, which is what leads me to believe they keep no records on the girls who flash tits and do nothing else, meaning, they have no way of knowing whether the girls are of age or not, unless they shoot explicit content of them.

    Mind you, this is conjecture, but they've never claimed to have docs for all their girls, only that they are "completely compliant."


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •