Quote Originally Posted by citiboyz View Post
I believe that the DOJ agreed to accept redacted ID's where all but the year of birth could be redacted. How does that help establish a performer's age on the actual day of production when the month and day on his ID can be redacted? Just wondering how that makes sense....
No kidding. There isn't much about 2257 that makes sense, actively protects children, or does anything to actually address CP, since none of the people who produce CP keep any records at all.

I remember reading the letter ruling you're referring to, and I believe there was something to the effect that if the content was shot in the year that the model turned 18, that the month was also required, but that was a while ago so I don't really remember the details.