Should The 3rd Party Processors Do This...

[gaystoryman]

Just because it happens all the time, doesn't make it right...

If the 3rd party processor is keeping the money, never returning it to the reseller, they are wrong. After x amount of time a cheque should be cut and sent, account closed, just like banks do with inactive accounts. It isn't their money, and they send out a notice, because people forget. It's the law, least up here, and if they don't respond, then it goes into some reserve of some kind, that they don't get access to, but I think defaults to the Government.

No response, then perhaps to the sponsor, but the 3rd party should after x amount of time, contact and then close the account.

my two cents

[Xstr8guy]

Just because it happens all the time, doesn't make it right...

If the 3rd party processor is keeping the money, never returning it to the reseller, they are wrong. After x amount of time a cheque should be cut and sent, account closed, just like banks do with inactive accounts. It isn't their money, and they send out a notice, because people forget. It's the law, least up here, and if they don't respond, then it goes into some reserve of some kind, that they don't get access to, but I think defaults to the Government.

No response, then perhaps to the sponsor, but the 3rd party should after x amount of time, contact and then close the account.

my two cents

Does anyone know for sure that CCbill doesn't already do this? It seems to me that we are assuming quite a bit. It would be nice if someone from CCbill could come by and clear this up.

[Lee]

Does anyone know for sure that CCbill doesn't already do this? It seems to me that we are assuming quite a bit. It would be nice if someone from CCbill could come by and clear this up.

No they dont, i have asked.

The only time the funds would be released is if the affiliate asks for them or, the affiliate hits the min payout on their account, otherwise the funds just sit there indefinately.

Regards,

Lee