Quote Originally Posted by LavenderLounge View Post
I sure HOPE there is a market for it - I own HairyMuscleTwinks.com!
Good Lord, hairy ... muscle ... twink ... that's not even possible. Twinks are neither muscular or hairy.

A hairy twink would not be considered a cub. The definition of a cub is hard to nail down. Usually it means a younger bear, but if you take a look at Bear Films, a lot of 40 and 50-year-old men call themselves cubs. And I've seen a lot of cubs on Bear Films that are in excessive of 300 pounds. I'd call those guys bears, but classification is often self determined. So if a man feels he's a cub, then he's a cub.

Cubs usually have a cuteness factor to them. Cubs are generally younger guys who may become bears when they "grow" up, but this isn't always the case. And cubs are generally a little on the stocky or thick side, but again, they don't have to be.

I would never classify a hairy twink as a cub just by the mere fact that he has hair. If he were hanging around the bear community, then perhaps. But as some have said, he'd more than likely be called an otter, although I don't really hear the otter and wolf words too much. Otters and wolfs were terms created by men who didn't fit the typical bear / cub classifications, but still felt they were / wanted to be a part of the bear community.

Michael