chad, i'd feel differently except that most porn companies tell their models flat out that if the tests are negative, they're safe. a lot of companies believe that someone showing a recent test means they're safe. yet people can fake test results, change dates on test results or simply have results that aren't accurate because of when they were infected.

i'm not saying laws should change.

i DO feel that potential models should have the risks explained accurately by people who actually understand what the risks are - and not just regarding HIV, either. i believe there are some jobs where full disclosure is the law, aren't there?