Quote Originally Posted by chadknowslaw View Post
When there is a gay producer that is condom - only that starts to produce straight material, but does so without condoms, is that bareback?

Seriously, is that producer who makes condom-only gay content but does not use condoms in their straight content, are they a bareback company or not? Should their material be excluded from awards considerations?

.

good point Chad - perhaps the director is searching for something - only analysis could say for sure - however, a director who directs should be able to experiment and broaden their artistic expression - neçt pas?

their principals and ethics shouldn't get in the way should they?

and as far as awards go, they should be allowed to submit the video for straight market consideration but I would think that the gay market wouldn't stand for it - unless of course there were special considerations - $$$ or something else perhaps?

Now here's what I would do If I were asked to direct a "straight movie" that involved models who fucked without condoms - I would consider doing something unique like shooting a video of two or more straight people fucking without condoms while they watch a video "on tv" of gay guys fucking with condoms... that would take care of the squeamish on both sides of the fence wouldn't it - or would I be banned because I AM a bareback director who actively fucks without condoms on and off the screen

all of this condom/no condom stuff - sheesh!

clue me in, I can't keep up with all the changing tides of the industry...

thank god Cam and I only shoot "natural sex"