ok - here's my re-cap...

documenting sex on film = art or porn?

the question remains what is art and what is porn

(see congressional arguments brought to the senate floor by Jesse Helms re; Robert Mapplethorpe and NEA funding)
(interesting arguments)

result: Mapplethorpe photographic prints skyrocket = $$$

sales of prints to Japanese investors = $$$

$$$ to fund T&C

ZyloCo = Porn = money

get the "picture" ? (no pun intended)