The opinion that matters most to a business that depends on sales is the opinion of the buyer.

Right now buyers want bareback.

Buyers do not buy porn because the company that made it has grand social ideals -- buyers buy porn because they want to get off.

I don't believe that companies that produce hardcore without condoms are evil beings that should be spit upon by the more righteous.

I believe that more and more companies will produce or market hardcore videos where the models do not use condoms.

I believe that "it is all about money". Yes, it is. Money is why companies exist. Without money, they cannot pay their employees who are usually the ones that complain "it is just about money". I have never heard an employer say "They just do it for the money" because an employer has to make payroll and mortgage and taxes and utilities and marketing costs and pay for employees to go to shows to party for 3 days and give out 10 business cards to other employees that are there to party for 3 days. It IS about the money, and if the consumer says "I want models that are not wearing condoms" then you either give it to them or don't make the sale. If you don't make enough sales, then jobs go away. Or they go to companies that DO provide the consumer what he wants. Any company can have high standards when the cash flows are good, but as revenues and profits are dropping listening to the consumer's desires becomes critically important.

With Condoms or Without seems to be the Abortion issue of the gay porn webmaster boards. Most are solidly in one corner or the other and little can be done or said to change any minds.

Personally, I wear a condom when I have sex. I have also watched bareback films and watching those films did not give me an uncontrollable urge to fuck someone without a condom, nor did it make me think that the producer was a greedy bastard that did not care about models.