i guess i'm looking at this as the model agreed to "bareback" thus he is responsible for his actions. ( interpreted: is a gun manufacturer liable should a consumer shoot himself? )
it is good that his goverment will take care of him , i'm still not understanding what kind of a message this will send out other than what i've mentioned that "tests' are not 100% and sometimes the results do not appear till later. ( interpreted: i test my models rigourously but tests are not 100% , i cannot follow them around 24/7 to verify they are not performing bareback , so i have to put all my "faith"? into a molded penis sleeve which i do not manufacture. )
i have produced "bareback" , i still view it as a personal choice and not one to be dictated by goverment , the reason i stopped was because it became too "high-risk" because often "bareback" performers perform bareback "off camera" and i did not want to be liable for what they may contract "outside" ( interpreted: i would rather deal with HIV tests and condoms and hope that either isn't faulty. )

jim

p.s ~ i have attached a pic to this post , if it is too graphic please remove it and my appologies to those that may be offended. ( interpreted: sometimes the way to fight fire is with fire. )