Quote Originally Posted by Special_K View Post
Two companies that I trust whole heartedly in this biz...and I have been doing this since '98.....are National Net and Too Much Media (Nats).

So to answer your question Lee....no I am not concerned in the least. If it was any other company, yeah I would be a little watchful.
You see thats interesting.

I say interesting because it already appears as if that conflict i mentioned above is starting to happen, they have mentioned that they will be adding a bunch of features to NATs for clients who utilize SegPay, and it sounds like they mean almost exclusively.

So basically, stick with your current processors, use the 'basic' version of NATs or, use OUR processor as your primary biller and get much better features.

They have to drive clients to SegPay, because very few people use them now, owning the industries most popular affiliate program script puts them in an ideal situation to do pretty much whatever they want.... Because pretty much everyone uses NATs.

What happens if they decide they no longer want to support Epoch or CCBill in NATs but only want to use it through SegPay? it would appear on the face of it, this is what they are planning on doing by only offering certain features of NATs to SegPay clients.

Yep, no conflict of interest there.

Regards,

Lee