Quote Originally Posted by Squirt View Post
I think that the case that some of the "no barebacking" camp makes is that whether the models have HIV or not isn't the point, it's that unprotected sex is being condoned in productions and people will mimic the activity without getting tested and put themselves in danger.

Some of the "pro barebacking" camp feel that if the models are HIV negative that they are safe and that's all that matters and people watching the production can make up their own minds.

Perhaps if something in the production showed them getting the test before bareabacking it would be seen as responsible by some?
Terrific Idea! What about a quick blurb at the beginning of the film stating the testing that takes place before production of the movie and encouraging people to practice safe sex and get tested regularly. I saw a few bareback films years ago that stated, quite boldly that the content of the video was for fantasy entertainment only and then it went on to encourage safe sex practices. Does this make the video any less erotic? Does it detract from sales? Is it the profits that keep studios from implementing such disclaimers?