Hypothetically speaking if there was a rumor that a couple people helped authorities to stay out of trouble themselves, does that protection carry over into civil court?
Hypothetically speaking if there was a rumor that a couple people helped authorities to stay out of trouble themselves, does that protection carry over into civil court?
I post here to whore this sig.
Short Answer No!
But the couple in question did not get an offer of immunity to "help" the prosecution in the criminal case.
If Chad is skimming this thread I heard scuttlebutt that Michael Kocis is also suing Attorney Sean Macias, Bryan's Cali Civil Trademark lawyer I have no idea why unless he misrepresented the Settlement between Sean Lockhart and Bryan Kocis signed in San Diego Jan 20,2007
Did they really kill him to lure his star actor over to THEIR porn business?
The only people who truly know the answer to that question (and I'm not trying to say who those people are, 'cause I don't know) aren't talking. So any answer would be purely speculative.
This case is a mess. The people who were charged don't seem to have a decent motive, unless they are completely stupid. Killing someone over a business deal, particularly over one model, no matter who it is, is simply ridiculous. On the other hand, Bryan had a lot of enemies, including more than one individual who directly stated they were interested in hiring hit men.
I'm not even sure that a guilty verdict in the cases of the two men charged will bring complete clarity to the case, unless the two charged individuals offer up a confession.
It's a sad state of affairs.
Originally Posted by Dilbertdidporn
I guess that case was bad for other lawyers as well if it is true.
One of Kocis' attorneys filed a complaint with the Arizona Bar Association against me because he dug up every post I ever made on GWW and reported a post I made about hiring hookers in Bangkok to the Bar as an ethical violation. It was dismissed as unfounded but I did have to explain to a Bar ethics investigator that yes, I am not ashamed to be openly gay, and yes I did write the post but I am sticking to it and by the way Mr. Bar Investigator Can I refer you to the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution??
I thought it was a very low and unethical tactic used against me personally.
Chad Belville, Esq
Phoenix, Arizona
www.chadknowslaw.com
Keeping you out of trouble is easier than getting you out of trouble!
Hi Chad I remember that attack against you, but of course you know that came from Kocis. He was like a wild attack dog in 2005 hiring PI's to investigate Grant Roy, Stalking Sean, harassment and stalking were the orders of the day.
I myself was offered cash to spy on them and keep track of daily activity's. (I live close by)
Gaybucks Chip Motive is only important as far as what Joe and Harlow believed Bryan's death would mean for them.
J & H were not, despite public statements interested in Brent Corrigan solely as a model but as an Escort. Boybatter was earning chump change as a Porn Co. (who here knew about them a year ago?)
The real income was Norfolk Escorts and the initial offer to Brent Corrigan was 10K then 30k where do you get numbers like that in Gay porn?
You Don't!
No matter Joe and Harlow were 1 Million dollars in debt one year ago Today!
Half Million on the house,
Over 120K in Credit cards maxed out!
4 high end cars.
Rolex watches(6)
They Owed everybody,,,
They had to make 32K a month just to make the minumum payments on their lifestyle, not counting Food,Gas,Electric,Gym,and Liposuction for Joe (6K)His & His Chinchilla Coats (spur of the moment purchase in Vegas)
$5995,00 each
There is your motive folks Cash Desperation!
They felt killing Bryan would somehow land them Brent Corrigan let them makes some vids fast then if that didn't earn enough,, get him to join the Escort biz and really make some money!
It all sounds to me like Meth Heads planning the perfect crime
Which means its was the Perfect Fuckup by two Yahoo's!
Holy shit you are the Perez Hilton of gay porn. You need a whole website now. You have a blog somewhere though don't you?
I post here to whore this sig.
Like I said, the people who know aren't talking, and everything else is speculation.
There are a ton of people who are in debt up to their eyeballs who don't go around killing people.
The circumstantial evidence, from what I've read of the original bill of particulars, certainly paints a pretty strong picture, but the motive is the weakest part. The alleged motive is also contradicted by the emails from Joe to Grant.
We simply don't know who did what, who put whom up to what, or anything else. It's all speculation.
That meth is really something. It's convincing people that their minds are expanding and filling them with wisdom, but it's really SHRINING their brains so that the dumbest ideas seem brilliant.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks