Thats interesting, im always seeing posts about sites that use 'legal' content on the str8 webmaster forums, whether they are paysite owners, tgp posters/owners or even blog owners.

Its almost as if these people need to say they are looking for legal content because otherwise they may be though of as a content theif, thats more what i dont understand, if webmasters are doing nothing wrong, WHY does there need to be a distinction, shouldnt it just be assumed that unless someone has a 'history' (especially people who have been in the industry for years) that they will be using 'legal' content?

I know there are only a handfull of people in the business who's integrity i would doubt and some of them have their own affiliate programs that seem to be growing.

An example, the Tube Tender sites when they launch, i have no intention of billing them as 'legal' sites because i shouldnt have to, it should be obvious to everyone, after working in the industry for over 10 years, that the content being used on the tours and inside the members areas isnt stolen.

Not one person who has viewed this thread has even questioned whether the content being used is legal, because they shouldnt have to, yet others post about 'legal' tube sites, paysites, blogs, etc, etc.

Regards,

Lee