Quote Originally Posted by jIgG View Post
don't we already have laws against having sex with someone who has not consented or can't consent?

Wouldn't these people be called rapists if they used a mentally impaired person for sex?

Naturally it would be a democrat introducing that, just as bad as the other side.

What is the chance that the district attorney and the politician are running for re-election?
This is true.

But they are talking about a more cowardly act than "just rape" though, in that these people are completely helpless...

But is there an underground pic trading market like with the kidstuff?

Anyhow the main thing i see in that article is that they're already starting to confound the legitimate, industry side of "porn business" with violence and crime in the mind of the public and reader.

Fuckers, really. There's no such thing as "child porn" - it's rape, subjugation and exploitation... the word porn should have never gotten involved.