That's right, Chip, what science calls a "spurious" conclusion.

As far as his statements about gay vs. straight sex...Likewise, it'd be easy to conjure lots of reasons, including technical, why sex with the same sex is more satisfying than with the opposite sex, and it'd be all just as stupid. People are going to find "objective" explanations through "science" and "religion" and anything they can to defend their fears and ignorance no matter what their sexual orientation, gender, religion, or level of education is until homophobia and sex phobia are erased. Considering his confusion and bias about something as basic as sexual orientation, I personally am not able to trust anything the man says about sex.

As for sex without a condom...who knows. It's easy to understand how condom can turn some people off. But latex turns some people on, too. For heaven's sake, I don't think we need studies for this. Personally, I think for all these reasons, including how he makes a great effort to insist he's objective and not including religion...smells like a very unscientific and personal agenda going on here.