cybersocket

[PFLJayden]

i have been trying to unsubscribe from cybersocket mailings for a long time now of numerous months. i cant. i called morgan tells me to unsubscribe from the emails. i told him it keeps sending me more emails and i cant. he said he doesnt know what to tell me. i keep trying to unsubscribe from the emails. i cant.
now im receiving cybersocket magazines in the mail attention to me. i called to be removed from there mailing list. they keep telling me they updated it and took me off.
this is annoying. anyone else having this problems?

[GayGeek]

Don't get Lee started on Cybersocket. He has strong opinions about them.

Lee's opinion in a single graphic: :fuckyou:

[Lee]

Don't get Lee started on Cybersocket. He has strong opinions about them.

Lee's opinion in a single graphic: :fuckyou:

I WAS trying to avoid replying to this thread LMAO

Regards,

Lee

[PFLJayden]

i hope they would see this thread. thats why i posted it. :evil:

[jeremyroddick]

I think I am receiving CyberSocket newsletter in 4-5 mail boxes I have and can't get to unsubscribe to any of them. Well I would maybe keep one active just to be in touch with what they are doing these days...but thats it. one.

[MysticMarketing]

OH Joy here we go LOL contact me I would be happy to unsubscribe all of you... holly@cybersocket dot com

[MysticMarketing]

i have been trying to unsubscribe from cybersocket mailings for a long time now of numerous months. i cant. i called morgan tells me to unsubscribe from the emails. i told him it keeps sending me more emails and i cant. he said he doesnt know what to tell me. i keep trying to unsubscribe from the emails. i cant.
now im receiving cybersocket magazines in the mail attention to me. i called to be removed from there mailing list. they keep telling me they updated it and took me off.
this is annoying. anyone else having this problems?

Who did you speak to? I would be happy to remove you from everything..:luke: We only send magazines to advertisers... So not sure why we would send you them... But send me your details please

[PFLJayden]

done and done. Please do not send me anymore bar rags. talked to morgan sommer :balls:

[PFLJayden]

thanks guys.

[MysticMarketing]

thanks guys.

Jayden I didn't get your email and I don't want you thinking I am ignoring you so can I have yours? Are you still with Keith at Helix?

[maxx68]

well I still get emails from SuperPoke Pets!!!!

[nickbaer]

In between rain showers yesterday, I walked over to Pleasure Chest and muddled through the rain soaked free publications sitting outside.

Found Cybersocket and Just Us Boys. After letting them dry out in my kitchen, I flipped through the pages with both hands.

Both mags have interesting ads, but the question always remains: why waste the trees to print the stuff? In 2003 or so I first found Cybersocket at a bar in Minneapolis, but that was in the prehistoric days of online Adult, when about all there was, was BadPuppy, Gay.com and DudeDorm.

But the pubs I picked up yesterday had no frontal nudes of the porn stars in the ads or the stories! Like: WHY? What is THAT all about?

[gaybucks_chip]

But the pubs I picked up yesterday had no frontal nudes of the porn stars in the ads or the stories! Like: WHY? What is THAT all about?

I'm guessing a combination of

a) free publication where they can't fully control distribution and so don't want grief from people claiming their underage kids got hold of the publication

b) distribution in states that aren't exactly "porn friendly" and wanting to avoid unnecessary claims of obscenity and the like, given that distribution is a lot wider than, say, allboy or playguy and the like.

[MysticMarketing]

I'm guessing a combination of

a) free publication where they can't fully control distribution and so don't want grief from people claiming their underage kids got hold of the publication

b) distribution in states that aren't exactly "porn friendly" and wanting to avoid unnecessary claims of obscenity and the like, given that distribution is a lot wider than, say, allboy or playguy and the like.

You are so right. Being freely distributed you have to be really careful. :yeah:

[nickbaer]

But that doesn't address the philosophical statement: with the Internet standard for porn pics being full frontal, why bother spending the money to print G rated pics in a print pub, with such frequency, over so many years?

At what point is the potential reader over saturated by impressions, that the impressions, the cost per impression, does noes motivate a new "click thru" action from pub to web browser.?

or is it all just "vanity", the gratification of seeing one's name in print in a tangible medium?