Many webmasters have complained over the years about Google not giving them PR1 or 2 for a variety of reasons, but this is a very different situation, because play dot google dot com is a commercial sales channel, where Google itself sells the products to consumers.

Not only are they being a morality filter within their commercial sales channel, but then they also dominate Google Search Engine Results for books! So we purveyors of otherwise legal nudity are being squeezed two ways.

Another example of a very slim and vague Acceptable Use Policy Terms & Conditions. Over the years, whenever I have had a nude book removed from a mainstream sales channel, the enforcers of said skinny AUP always have one-word names from the mid-East, similar to those names we have come to know from "customer service" centers experiences in India, Pakistan, even a bit south in Malaysia.

I'm concerned how someone in another culture, religion, government can evaluate art and speech for American based companies.