Obviously the article is crap, but it definitely doesn't change the fact that IBill's up to no good, at the expense of countless webmasters.

Reading between the lines of the IBill CMI is much better reading than that "article" and paints all the story that need be painted to see what it is they're up to.


It should be pointed out, however, that article is presented as a "opinion" piece. So some editorializing is, of course, inevitable. It's nowhere near qualifying as a piece of investigative journalism, but an op ed and no more.