Jasun,
I prefer single sites over the conglomerate-sites model. I find single sites are often run by one or two people and they're a labour of love, therefore, they're usually better quality.
I tend not to like cookie-cutter sites because they also tend to feature the same content over and over again.
I like gay sites made by gay people. There are a number of straight people who do gay sites well, but they're few and far between. So things like gays, gag that cocksucker, trick the "straight" guy don't appeal to me.
I like original content. I don't care about hosted galleries or free content. I don't use a lot of it. In fact, I tend to prefer programs that keep their content tight. Men at Play converts well for me because it's content hasn't been chewed up on TGPs.
I stay away from any sponsor that is based in Russia. Too much of their stuff looks dodgy, and judging how that part of the world acts on TGPs and AVS's, I'm never really sure if I'd get much of the money I earned anyway. Besides the English on their tour pages is often bad and as a credit card holder that makes me think, "Uh oh, is my credit card safe?"
I also steer clear of anything too young. I don't care if you claim to have 2257 docs. In my country, if the cops think he looks underage, they swoop in first, maybe ask questions later, and then, you spend the next five years of your life in court.
Finally, I tend to like sites that are niche specific like: English Lads, Men at Play, or Varisty Men.
Jasun, are you asking because Fratmen TV is thinking of starting one? It's exactly the kind of site I'd promote. BTW, you might want to tell them to fill up all that "white" space on the left side of their homepage ... tsk, tsk, tsk, what a waste of prime real estate.
Cheers
Dzinerbear





Reply With Quote
LOL

Bookmarks