I have to say im in two minds about this question.

On one hand, if you dont give them a copy of the shoots they may feel 'uncomfortable' that they have images of them in 'compromising situations' on the web and that may dissuade them from doing any further shoots but at the same time, it ensures that your content isnt being sold by a third party who really doesnt have any rights to sell it.

Yet on the other hand, by giving them a copy of the shoots they will feel comfortable knowing exactly what context the shoot will be used for and that in turn may compel them to return to do further shoots however, as mentioned above, it may also lead to them trying to not only sell the content but also approach other studios / producers about getting work from them too.

Personally, i dont see why, as long as it is made perfectly clear that the content is for their own private use and it isnt to be resold that models shouldnt be given a copy of not only the shoot but also a copy of the 2257 docs and model release form, if for no other reason than if there is ever a disbute from the model about what they did and didnt do you can tell them that you provided them with everything you shot and, they agreed to the shoot.

I would also think that any half-decent lawyer would be able to prove that you were above board if it needed to go to court because, you were open and gave the photoshoot to the model.

Just my thoughts on the question at hand anyway

Regards,

Lee