Personally, based on the evidence that has been presented this far in the case, if i were on the jury i would have to go with not guilty.

The kids brother has admitted lying under oath (several times), the kid himself has admitted lying under oath (several times) as well as on television for the Bashir interview, the kids mother seems to have told the kid 'what to say'.

All of that tells me that something isnt right with the accusations, if Jackson did what he has been accused of doing, the kid wouldnt have had to fabricate stories he would be able to say what happened, when it happened (within reason) and what he did after it happened especially when he was asked by a school councellor a few days after the incident supposedly took place if Jackson had 'touched him sexually' and he told the councellor that he hadnt, even after the guy tried to get the kid to say that Jackson had.

He'll get off and, im pretty sure the reason he will get off is because he didnt do it and the mother is looking for a payout.

Regards,

Lee