Here is a piece of the original post on GFY that prompted this...
Quote:
Thank you for your activation request. Unfortunately your activation request cannot be accepted. We are unable to provide our billing services for websites which contain images of twink content, regardless of the nature of the images and regardless as to whether said images are legal or not.
Please understand that we make no statement as to the quality or intentions of your website. This is simply our editorial policy. We regret this incompatibility and hope you are able to find what you are looking for elsewhere.







I contacted GloBill not as a client (which I am) but as the owner of GWW... I asked them about not only this policy but the webmaster relation aspect... here is there response which btw is a cut and paste:

Quote:
Hello Gary,

Young teens, male or female, are acceptable as long as all models are at least 18 years of age or older.

However, the words twink and ita have come to be associated too strongly with underaged content, and it is simply the use of those words that we are currently not allowing.





I do understand the avoidance of underage content - I'm all for it and support it!

But when did twink come to represent under age or even become synonymous with Lolita? This is news to me and I keep up on things like this LOL

What's your opinion... I'd really like to know.

Regards,
Gary-Alan