Which do you prefer?

[BDBionic]

oh and I like #2

[CashAddict]

Wow, that was quick.

I'll try you on ICQ.

[JoeG]

I'm partial to the 1st example. More imagery and less text. You know how we men are. :francais:

[Top Cat]

I like #2.

Now, I think my prize for voting should be the home phone number of the model one the left. Seems only fair to me. :playboy:

[Dzinerbear]

I loved number 1. I didn't understand why you changed it. When I saw it a couple of weeks back, I thought: "Oh, that's not as exciting." Maybe it was Big Ben, it's such a good phallic symbol.

Dzinerbear

[AusCoding Allan]

Definitely prefer no.1

Cheers,

Allan

[gaystoryman]

Oh definately #1... I do like that collection...

[CashAddict]

I've been running both (randomly) for a while as an experiment.

Number 1 is pretty and shows a lot of different models.

I prefer number 2 though, as it's a bit different to what people expect a porn site to look like. It's got a more amateur feel too, which means new members tend to be more impressed when they see how much is actually inside.

Can anyone think of a disadvantage in having both and letting affiliates choose which they want to promote?

[gaystoryman]

I think having both options for webmasters would be a great idea as long as its clear and easy to link to.

BTW just signed up for it but now comes the question, how does one get to your webmaster section other than what ccBill has, which is just the banners..?

I'd also perhaps list in your webmaster area the conversion ratio of each tour... so the webmaster has an idea of which is doing what...

[robin]

Tour #2 is nice but I think I prefer #1.

Big ben, the logo and the hottie on the righthand side are doing it for me.

[CashAddict]

BTW just signed up for it but now comes the question, how does one get to your webmaster section other than what ccBill has, which is just the banners..?

You should get a welcome e-mail with more details. Hit me up on icq (133031563) if you need anything, or e-mail me - chris@britishtwinks.com

[Bec]

I vote for #1, but you can certainly provide links for your affiliates to choose tour 1 or tour 2.

[robin]

I prefer number 2 though, as it's a bit different to what people expect a porn site to look like. It's got a more amateur feel too, which means new members tend to be more impressed when they see how much is actually inside.

Can anyone think of a disadvantage in having both and letting affiliates choose which they want to promote?

I can see why you'd try and even like #2 better then. Good idea.

I think having two tour options would be a good idea for affiliates. One might work better than the other depending on ones own traffic.

[Scorpio]

For sure: http://www.britishtwinks.com/1/
The other is confusing and too simple for me.

[IntenseCash.com]

I like #1 is way better and shows more of what your site has to offer. The other one is just too simple.

Mark