Very interesting thread!

Plain and simple, I do bareback sites because it is a turn-on of mine. I don't do "boy" sites because it is a turn-off for me.

Both fetishes are fantasies for the surfers. Those that fantasize about bareback sex are hurting no one. Will men continue to engage in risky behaviors? Yes. Will showing bareback images cause people to engage in unsafe sex who would otherwise use comdoms? I highly doubt it.

If you read the model release forms for HDK photo sets, there is a disclaimer that states that the performer is to assume that all participants are HIV+. For the stars of bareback movies today, let's be honest here folks, I'm about 99% sure that most, if not all are HIV+ and healthy. There is some risk of re-infection for these performers, but modern medicine has done a lot for reducing viral loads, thus reducing further risk for the performers.

"Gift givers" and "bug chasers" are another matter completely. This is a growing phenomenom I just don't understand. Who in their right mind would knowingly infect or try to contract a deadly disease? This verges on murder/suicide.


Those that fantasize about sex with under-age boys are the scum of society. Imo, many of the teen/boy sites that I have seen ARE pushing the line... bigtime! Even if the models are "barely" 18, many of them look impossibly pre-pubescent... and that makes my stomach turn! These sites seem to pander to potential pedophiles.