Greetings:

Quote Originally Posted by basschick
using part of a sexually explicit pic, like using on the head on a masturbation pic, or censoring a pic, won't legally cover you. i already talked to my lawyer about this, and he said if the pic was sexually explicit you need i.d.
My attorney told me the same thing, IF you're the one that altered the explicit picture to censor it. IE: if an affiliate were to be the one that edited an explicit picture to censor it, he/she then becomes a secondary producer, and needs the IDs.

However, if the affiliate is provided with a pic that's already censored, since they never had the explicit material, and never edited it, they are not a secondary producer, and don't need the ID.