Quote Originally Posted by Matt 26z
POINT BEING of this thread, if you are a webmaster who believes the secondary producer portions of the new 2257 effect you, then you don't have a few weeks to comply and become custodian of records. You are breaking the law TODAY since it's always been there.
You make a great point there. The secondary producer issue is only part of the equation. The other stressor here is the bogus filing system they are now requiring that demands redundant copies of content and duplicate files for performers that are shot more then once or have aliases ( depending on which attorney is deciphering the regs for you ), and this is just for the primary producer.

It seems the new regs have been created as a retribution for being in the adult industry, no matter how honest, straight laced, and by the book you may be, you will not know how to fully comply with the vague regulations, and risk arrest and prosecution.

Not to mention the violation of right to privacy by being forced to publish your name and (what could be your private residence) address on a worldwide adult website. Somehow it doesn't seem legal that a private residence, where children reside, must be listed on a worldwide porn site.

By law my corporation can assign a registered agent to communicate on my behalf and these regulations are trying to take that right away without due process. I'm all for getting the bad guys.. but putting good people, and innocent children, at such risk isn't the right way to do it :extat: