they could have seen it before - remember, whoever enforced this will see porn EVERY day. common stuff, they'll come to know.

also if you use that set anywhere else and show the i.d. for it, they may recognize it from the other page.

probably they won't recognize it at all, but if that's your freedom you're gambling with. why not just buy a legitimately non sexually explicit set and take the gamble out of the equation?

GLBTcity - it IS how the viewer interprets it. but the judge who makes the decision in your case will also be an interpreting viewer, and he/she may be a hardcore christian who won't have a pic of classic statues from greece in his house or office.


Quote Originally Posted by tombarr
so if i crop a photo of a naked man and put it on a website, how does the law know that it is the original format of the image? how does the law know i did not obtain the image cropped? so using this theory, posting shirtless men falls under 2257 also as we would not know if the photos were originals, or digitally altered as in cropping?